Lecture 7: Applications of Design Optimization

Welcome to our final scheduled lecture, where we bring together all the theoretical and methodological concepts we’ve covered and demonstrate their profound impact on real-world engineering. Today, we will explore various applications of design optimization across different engineering disciplines, focusing particularly on mechanical engineering systems. The goal is to illustrate how the systematic approach of optimum design leads to superior, more efficient, and cost-effective solutions in practice.

Design optimization is not just an academic exercise; it’s an indispensable tool in modern engineering. From the smallest component to the largest structural system, engineers are constantly challenged to improve performance, reduce costs, enhance reliability, and ensure safety. Design optimization provides the structured framework to meet these challenges.

1. Structural Engineering Applications

Structural engineering is a prime field for design optimization, where objectives often include minimizing weight, material cost, or manufacturing effort, subject to strict constraints on stress, deflection, buckling, and fatigue.

Example: Minimum-Weight Column/Beam Design

Recall our earlier example of a tubular column or a rectangular beam. The objective is typically to minimize the material volume or mass, which directly relates to cost. The design variables might be the cross-sectional dimensions (e.g., mean radius and wall thickness for a column, or width and height for a beam).

The constraints are crucial: * Strength Constraints: The stresses developed under expected loads (axial, bending, shear) must not exceed the material’s allowable stress or yield strength. These often involve nonlinear relationships with the design variables. * Stability Constraints: For columns, buckling must be prevented. The critical buckling load must be greater than the applied load, which is also a nonlinear function of geometry and material properties. * Deflection Constraints: The deformation of the structure under load must be within acceptable limits (e.g., to prevent cracking of finishes, or to ensure functionality). * Geometric/Manufacturing Constraints: Practical limits on dimensions, such as minimum wall thickness or maximum allowable aspect ratios for manufacturability or to prevent local buckling.

Numerical methods like Sequential Linear Programming (SLP) or Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) are essential here, as the objective and constraint functions are typically nonlinear. For example, optimizing a two-member frame involves dealing with several design variables and constraints related to member stresses, fundamental frequency, and geometry. The iterative numerical process helps navigate this complex design space to find the optimal configuration.

Example: Optimal Design of Steel Structures using Standard Sections

In practice, engineers often select components from a predefined list of standard sections (e.g., I-beams, channels, angles). This introduces discrete design variables, where the choice is not a continuous range but a selection from a catalog. Problems of this nature fall under Mixed Variable Optimization (MV-OPT).

Here, the optimization might involve: * Objective: Minimize the weight of the steel structure. * Design Variables: The standard section designation (e.g., W10x33, W12x26) for each structural member. * Constraints: All the usual structural constraints (stress, deflection, buckling) as per design codes (e.g., AISC specifications), but now the properties (area, moment of inertia, section modulus) are looked up from the chosen discrete section.

These problems are significantly more challenging than continuous optimization and often require specialized methods like branch-and-bound, simulated annealing, or genetic algorithms, which can effectively search discrete solution spaces.

2. Mechanical System Design Applications

Optimization is integral to designing mechanical components and systems for performance, durability, and cost-effectiveness.

Example: Optimal Design of a Helical Spring

Consider the design of a compression helical spring for a given application. This is a classic example of a nonlinear programming problem.

• Objective: Often to minimize the mass or volume of the spring, which relates to material usage and space.
• Design Variables:
  • \(d\): wire diameter
  • \(D\): mean coil diameter
  • \(N\): number of active coils
• Constraints:
  • Shear Stress: The shear stress in the spring wire must not exceed the allowable shear stress for the material. This is a complex nonlinear function of \(d, D\), and the applied force.
  • Deflection: The spring must be able to achieve a specified deflection without going solid or exceeding its elastic limit.
  • Surge Frequency: The natural frequency of the spring must be sufficiently higher than the excitation frequency to avoid resonance.
  • Geometric Constraints: Limits on the outer diameter (to fit in space), free length, and sometimes a minimum number of coils for stability.

Solving this problem analytically for all KKT conditions would be arduous due to the nonlinearities. Numerical methods, often implemented in tools like Excel Solver (using the GRG Nonlinear method), are employed to find the optimal combination of \(d, D,\) and \(N\) that satisfies all requirements while minimizing mass.

3. Manufacturing and Process Optimization

Optimization extends beyond the physical design of components to the planning and sequencing of manufacturing processes.

Example: Bolt Insertion Sequence or Welding Sequence

Imagine a robotic arm tasked with inserting bolts into a predrilled metal plate or welding various points on an automotive subassembly. The objective is to minimize the total travel distance or time of the robotic arm to complete all operations.

• Objective: Minimize total travel distance/time.
• Design Variables: The sequence in which the operations (bolt insertions, welds) are performed. If there are \(N\) locations, there are \(N!\) possible sequences.
• Constraints: Each location must be visited exactly once.

This is a variant of the famous Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP), which is a discrete optimization problem. Since the number of permutations grows factorially, full enumeration quickly becomes impossible for even a moderate number of locations (e.g., 10! = 3,628,800, 16! \(\approx 2 \times 10^{13}\)). Nature-inspired search methods, particularly Genetic Algorithms (GAs), are well-suited for such problems. GAs employ principles of natural selection and evolution to efficiently search large, discrete solution spaces, finding near-optimal sequences in a fraction of the time required by exhaustive search.

4. Advanced Applications and Cross-Disciplinary Areas

Design optimization is also applied in more complex and interdisciplinary fields:

• Optimal Control: While distinct from optimum design, many optimal control problems can be rephrased as optimization problems. For instance, determining the optimal control forces to bring a dynamic system to rest in minimum time or with minimum energy consumption can be formulated as a nonlinear programming problem. Here, the “design variables” become parameters defining the control strategy over time.
• Robust Design (Taguchi Methods): This approach focuses on designing systems that are insensitive to variations in manufacturing, operating conditions, or environmental factors. The objective often involves minimizing a “loss function” that accounts for both the mean performance and its variability.
• Reliability-Based Design Optimization (RBDO): Instead of deterministic constraints (e.g., stress \(\le\) allowable stress), RBDO incorporates the probabilistic nature of loads, material properties, and manufacturing tolerances. The constraints are formulated to ensure a certain “probability of failure” is below a target value (e.g., 99.9% reliability).

5. Engineering Economic Analysis

In specific scenarios, formal mathematical optimization techniques, such as calculus, are employed to find minimum or maximum points for costs or profits:

• Cost Minimization: Total Cost (C) or Net Annual Cost (NAC) can be expressed as a function of a variable (like production volume, \(Q\), or amount of chemical purchased, \(X\)). To find the minimum total cost, the first derivative of the cost function is set to zero (\(\text{dC/dQ}=0\)). This process confirms the production rate at which total cost is minimized.
• Profit Maximization: Similarly, when Total Profit (\(\text{TP}\)) is a function of production volume (\(x\)), the production level that maximizes profit is found by setting the first derivative (\(\text{dTP/dx}\)) equal to zero.
• Economic Life: The determination of an asset’s minimum cost life relies on finding the number of years that minimizes the EUAC. This minimum point represents the optimal balance between the high annual capital cost of short ownership and the increasing operating and maintenance (O&M) costs associated with extended ownership. Spreadsheets are widely used to compute the optimal economic life by finding the EUAC minimum.

🔗 Visit the Engineering Economics Analysis Course — Learn complementary Engineering Economics Analysis Techniques

Conclusion

As you can see, design optimization is a versatile and powerful discipline. From optimizing the dimensions of a structural element for minimal weight to planning the most efficient sequence of operations on a factory floor, the principles and methods we’ve studied are directly applicable to a vast array of engineering challenges. The ability to mathematically formulate a problem, identify the objective, define constraints, and apply appropriate numerical methods is a fundamental skill for any engineer seeking to create truly optimal designs in today’s competitive and resource-conscious world.

This concludes our lectures on Design Optimization. I hope you’ve gained a comprehensive understanding of how to systematically approach engineering design problems to find the best possible solutions. Good luck with your future design endeavors!