World War I

Key Takeaways The Breakdown Rate: At Cambrai, 179 of 378 tanks were out of action by the end of Day 1—mostly from mechanical failure, not enemy fire. The Learning Curve: Early tank tactics were catastrophically wrong. Tanks were scattered, unsupported, and sent against impossible terrain. The Institutional Resistance: Cavalry officers saw tanks as a threat to their arm. Artillery officers resented sharing resources. Infantry didn't trust machines. The Haig Problem: The Commander-in-Chief swung from skepticism to over-reliance, never quite understanding what tanks could and couldn't do. The Eventual Success: By 1918, combined arms doctrine finally worked—but only after two years of painful learning. The Machine That Would End War In September 1916, a strange new weapon crawled across the churned mud of the Somme. It was slow, loud, and terrifying. Soldiers on both sides had never seen anything like it. ...

Key Takeaways The Forgotten Victory: The Hundred Days (August-November 1918) was one of history's most successful military campaigns, yet barely exists in public memory. The Learning Organization: The British Army of 1918 was utterly transformed from the amateur force of 1916—professional, coordinated, and lethal. Combined Arms Mastery: Infantry, tanks, artillery, and aircraft finally worked as an integrated system, not separate arms. The Black Day: August 8, 1918 was the "black day of the German Army"—when Ludendorff knew the war was lost. Why We Forgot: Victory doesn't fit the tragedy narrative. The war poets didn't write about winning. The War That Nobody Won Ask anyone how World War I ended, and you’ll hear the same story: ...

Key Takeaways Artillery was King: Over 60% of WWI casualties came from artillery. It was the dominant weapon of the war. The Registration Problem: Pre-war artillery required "registration"—test shots that revealed your attack was coming. Surprise was impossible. The Solution: "Predicted fire" used math to eliminate registration. You could hit targets without warning. Sound and Flash: New technologies located enemy guns by their sound and muzzle flash, enabling counter-battery fire that silenced the opposition. The Creeping Barrage: Precisely timed artillery support let infantry advance behind a wall of explosions—the tactical innovation that broke the stalemate. The Forgotten Revolution When we think of World War I technology, we think of tanks, aircraft, and poison gas. The dramatic. The novel. The photogenic. ...

Key Takeaways The Gap: Haig was a cavalry officer commanding an army of artillery, tanks, and aircraft. He never fully understood the technologies that won his war. The Oscillation: Haig swung between excessive enthusiasm for new weapons and unrealistic expectations of what they could do. The Delegation: Middle managers (corps commanders) drove real innovation while Haig focused on strategy and politics. The Eventual Adaptation: By 1918, Haig had learned to trust his technical subordinates—and victory followed. The Lesson: Leaders don't need to understand technology in detail. They need to know what they don't know. The Cavalry Officer’s War Douglas Haig was born to command cavalry. He trained for it, excelled at it, and believed in it. When he became Commander-in-Chief of the British Expeditionary Force in December 1915, he was the finest cavalry officer Britain had produced in a generation. ...

Key Takeaways Transformation Under Fire: The British Army reinvented itself while fighting a war—a feat of organizational adaptation rarely matched in history. From Top-Down to Bottom-Up: Innovation shifted from GHQ directives to front-line experimentation, with the best ideas spreading through the system. The Training Cycle: Units rotated out of line, retrained on new methods, and returned. Learning became systematic. Staff Integration: The "all-arms" battle required unprecedented coordination. Staff work became the critical skill. Institutional Memory: Lessons were captured in manuals, taught in schools, and tested in exercises. Knowledge became organizational rather than personal. The 1916 Army vs. The 1918 Army On July 1, 1916, the British Army attacked at the Somme. By nightfall, 57,000 men were casualties—19,000 dead. It was the bloodiest day in British Military and Logistics. ...

Key Takeaways The organizational chaos: Supplies were loaded onto ships in England with no consideration for unloading sequence. Ammunition was buried under tents; rations were packed with artillery shells. The labeling disaster: Crates were mislabeled, unlabeled, or labeled in ways incomprehensible to receiving units. Soldiers searching for rifle ammunition found medical supplies; those seeking food found spare parts. The beach breakdown: Gallipoli's beaches became choked with supplies that couldn't be sorted, stored, or distributed. Desperately needed items sat feet from men who died for lack of them. The systemic lesson: Gallipoli's logistics failure wasn't individual incompetence—it was the predictable result of a system where no one was responsible for the whole supply chain. The Campaign That Couldn’t Feed Itself In early 1915, Winston Churchill, First Lord of the Admiralty, championed a daring strategy: force the Dardanelles strait with naval power, capture Constantinople, knock the Ottoman Empire out of the war, and open a supply route to Russia. It was bold, imaginative, and potentially war-winning. ...