Russia

Key Takeaways The numbers: Of 600,000 soldiers who invaded Russia, approximately 400,000 died—the majority from starvation, disease, and exposure, not combat. The fatal assumption: Napoleon planned to "live off the land" as he had successfully done in wealthy Western Europe. Russia's sparse population and scorched-earth tactics made this impossible. The culminating point: The Grande Armée was logistically exhausted before it reached Moscow. The city's capture was strategically meaningless because the army couldn't sustain itself there. The universal lesson: Ambitious operations that outrun their supply capabilities don't just fail—they collapse catastrophically when the culminating point is passed. The Army That Ate Itself In June 1812, Napoleon Bonaparte assembled the largest army Europe had ever seen. The Grande Armée numbered over 600,000 soldiers—French veterans, reluctant allies from Prussia and Austria, Italian auxiliaries, Polish cavalry eager to fight Russia. It was a multinational force of unprecedented scale, equipped with the finest artillery and led by the era’s most successful general. ...

The Invisible Army ← Series Home Key Takeaways "Living off the land" has limits: Napoleon's system worked in densely populated Europe with multiple harvest cycles. Russia's sparse population and single harvest made it unsustainable. Speed became the enemy: The faster Napoleon advanced, the more his supply lines stretched and broke. His greatest strength became his fatal weakness. 600,000 men cannot forage: Small armies can supplement supplies locally. Mega-armies consume everything and starve—no amount of foraging skill compensates for mass. The enemy gets a vote: Russia's scorched-earth strategy negated Napoleon's entire supply doctrine. He had no backup plan. The Revolutionary Supply System Napoleon Bonaparte transformed European warfare through tactical and operational genius. But his most important innovation—rarely discussed in the heroic accounts—was logistical: the système de la guerre. ...

The Kinetic Chain 1 Part 1: Alexander's Invisible Army 2 Part 2: Napoleon's Fatal Calculation 3 Part 3: The Railroad Revolution 4 Part 4: The Crimean Catastrophe 5 Part 5: Barbarossa and the Battle of the Gauges 6 Part 6: The Battle of the Bulge and the Tyranny of Fuel 7 Part 7: Wholesale Distribution and the American Way of 8 Part 8: The Pacific Logistics Challenge 9 Part 9: Victory Through Logistics 10 Part 10: Vietnam and the Tyranny of Terrain 11 Part 11: Giap's Bicycle Brigades 12 Part 12: The Ho Chi Minh Trail 13 Part 13: American Largesse in Vietnam 14 Part 14: The M16 Debacle and Logistics Failure 15 Part 15: The Falklands Logistics Miracle 16 Part 16: Desert Storm and the Logistics Miracle 17 Part 17: The Future of Contested Logistics ← Series Home Key Takeaways "Living off the land" has limits: Napoleon's system worked in densely populated Europe with multiple harvest cycles. Russia's sparse population and single harvest made it unsustainable. Speed became the enemy: The faster Napoleon advanced, the more his supply lines stretched and broke. His greatest strength became his fatal weakness. 600,000 men cannot forage: Small armies can supplement supplies locally. Mega-armies consume everything and starve—no amount of foraging skill compensates for mass. The enemy gets a vote: Russia's scorched-earth strategy negated Napoleon's entire supply doctrine. He had no backup plan. The Revolutionary Supply System Napoleon Bonaparte transformed European warfare through tactical and operational genius. But his most important innovation—rarely discussed in the heroic accounts—was logistical: the système de la guerre. ...