British soldiers suffering in Crimean winter with supplies visible in background

The Invisible Army - Part 4: The Crimean Catastrophe

The Invisible Army ← Series Home Key Takeaways Paper systems kill: The British Army had supply regulations. They just didn't work in practice. The gap between documented procedures and field reality cost thousands of lives. Bureaucracy can be lethal: Soldiers died because requisition forms weren't filled correctly, because departments wouldn't coordinate, because no one had authority to fix obvious problems. Visibility matters: The Crimea was the first war with embedded journalists. Public outrage at the logistics disaster forced reforms that might never have happened otherwise. Crisis creates reform: The catastrophe produced the modern military supply system�central supply corps, professional logistics officers, and integrated medical services. The War That Broke the System In September 1854, a British army of 27,000 men landed in Crimea to besiege the Russian fortress of Sevastopol. They expected a short campaign�perhaps a few months to capture the fortress and dictate peace. ...

British soldiers suffering in Crimean winter with supplies visible in background

The Kinetic Chain - Part 4: The Crimean Catastrophe

The Kinetic Chain 1 Part 1: Alexander's Invisible Army 2 Part 2: Napoleon's Fatal Calculation 3 Part 3: The Railroad Revolution 4 Part 4: The Crimean Catastrophe 5 Part 5: Barbarossa and the Battle of the Gauges 6 Part 6: The Battle of the Bulge and the Tyranny of Fuel 7 Part 7: Wholesale Distribution and the American Way of 8 Part 8: The Pacific Logistics Challenge 9 Part 9: Victory Through Logistics 10 Part 10: Vietnam and the Tyranny of Terrain 11 Part 11: Giap's Bicycle Brigades 12 Part 12: The Ho Chi Minh Trail 13 Part 13: American Largesse in Vietnam 14 Part 14: The M16 Debacle and Logistics Failure 15 Part 15: The Falklands Logistics Miracle 16 Part 16: Desert Storm and the Logistics Miracle 17 Part 17: The Future of Contested Logistics ← Series Home Key Takeaways Paper systems kill: The British Army had supply regulations. They just didn't work in practice. The gap between documented procedures and field reality cost thousands of lives. Bureaucracy can be lethal: Soldiers died because requisition forms weren't filled correctly, because departments wouldn't coordinate, because no one had authority to fix obvious problems. Visibility matters: The Crimea was the first war with embedded journalists. Public outrage at the logistics disaster forced reforms that might never have happened otherwise. Crisis creates reform: The catastrophe produced the modern military supply system—central supply corps, professional logistics officers, and integrated medical services. The War That Broke the System In September 1854, a British army of 27,000 men landed in Crimea to besiege the Russian fortress of Sevastopol. They expected a short campaign—perhaps a few months to capture the fortress and dictate peace. ...

The Fading Memory of Disaster

The Secret Life of Ordinary Objects - Part 10: Learning Nothing: The Fading Memory of Disaster and the Choice to Rebuild Vulnerability

The Secret Life of Ordinary Objects ← Series Home The Cycle of Revelation and Resistance: Why Societies Consistently Squander the Window for Reform The catastrophic failure of a city or an industry—be it through flood, fire, or earthquake—serves as a powerful, agonizing moment of collective revelation. It strips away the comforting illusions of equity and competence, exposing the deep-seated political and economic choices that predetermine who lives, who dies, and who ultimately benefits from the disaster’s aftermath. ...

Balance scales weighing quantity versus quality

Development Delusions - Part 10: Informality - The $200 Billion Elephant in the Room

Development Delusions ← Series Home Can Less Be More? A Radical Rethinking of Foreign Aid Throughout this series, we have dissected the development delusions—the $200+ billion industry built on contradictions, fueled by imperatives to spend, obsessed with control, staffed by transient expatriates, and locked in a symbiotic trap with recipient governments. We have seen how it generates processism, how it ignores the vast informal economies where most people live and work, and how it fundamentally struggles to catalyze the deep, politically contentious transformations that genuine development requires. The question that remains is: can this industry reform? Can less, indeed, be more? This final post confronts the implications of our anatomy. ...