Still life of a vintage scientific experiment setup, focusing on the psychological tension between scientific authority and moral consequence.

The Hidden Code of Connection – Part 3 : Justifying the Unthinkable: Authority, Aggression, and Moral Compromise

The Hidden Code of Connection 1 Architects of Reality: How the Social Mind Predicts the World 2 Compliance and Conversion: Navigating the Pressures of Social Influence 3 Justifying the Unthinkable: Authority, Aggression, and Moral Compromise 4 Us vs. Them: The Psychology of Intergroup Conflict and Identity 5 Hardwired for Affiliation: Love, Loss, and the Need to Belong ← Series Home The Insidious Power of Obedience to Authority The study of social influence reveals a capacity for compliance and conformity, but an extreme and particularly pernicious form is obedience to authority. Driven by the need to understand the atrocities of the Holocaust, Stanley Milgram conducted his famous obedience studies at Yale in the 1960s to determine how normal individuals could follow immoral orders. In the study, participants (“teachers”) were required to administer increasing levels of electric shocks to a confederate (“learner”) for incorrect word pairings, believing the shocks were real and potentially dangerous. ...

Stylized graphic representation of minimal group categorization and the dynamics of intergroup bias.

The Hidden Code of Connection – Part 3 : Us vs. Them: The Psychology of Intergroup Conflict and Identity

The Hidden Code of Connection 1 Architects of Reality: How the Social Mind Predicts the World 2 Compliance and Conversion: Navigating the Pressures of Social Influence 3 Justifying the Unthinkable: Authority, Aggression, and Moral Compromise 4 Us vs. Them: The Psychology of Intergroup Conflict and Identity 5 Hardwired for Affiliation: Love, Loss, and the Need to Belong ← Series Home From Interpersonal Conflict to Group Identity To understand social conflict fully, analysis must shift from the individual’s perspective to the intergroup perspective, recognizing that individuals categorize themselves as group members. This intergroup mindset—thinking in terms of competition rather than personal differences—profoundly affects behavior. Musaf Sherif’s research set the stage for this understanding, moving beyond intragroup processes (like conformity) to focus on how comparisons between one’s own group and others affect prejudice and hostility. ...