Split image showing oil derrick with wealth flowing upward on one side and economic destruction on the other

The Resource Curse: Why Oil Wealth Destroys Nations – And How One Country Escaped

Key Takeaways The Paradox: Countries with abundant natural resources often grow slower and suffer more corruption than resource-poor nations. Dutch Disease: Resource exports strengthen the currency, making other industries uncompetitive – hollowing out the economy. The Spending Trap: Governments treat temporary resource windfalls as permanent income, creating unsustainable obligations. Norway's Secret: Strong institutions existed before oil discovery – the wealth didn't corrupt because the system was already corruption-resistant. The 4% Rule: Norway spends only 4% of fund returns annually, treating oil wealth as capital to preserve, not income to consume. In 1969, workers on the Ocean Viking drilling rig struck oil in Norway’s North Sea. What happened next should have been predictable: the same story of boom, corruption, and collapse that had played out in Nigeria, Venezuela, Angola, and countless other petrostates. ...

Norwegian government official standing firm against oil company executives with North Sea platforms in background

Master, Not Servant: How Norway Tamed Big Oil Without Scaring It Away

Key Takeaways The Paradox: Norway imposed some of the world's toughest terms on oil companies – and they kept investing anyway. The 78% Take: Norway captures ~78% of oil profits through taxes and ownership, far above the global average. Staged Escalation: Norway started with generous terms, then tightened as expertise grew and investments became sunk costs. Technology Transfer: Every foreign contract required training Norwegians and using local suppliers – building domestic capability. The National Champion: Statoil (now Equinor) gave Norway inside knowledge of what was actually profitable, preventing industry bluffs. When multinational oil companies arrive in a developing country, the script is familiar: “Give us favorable terms, or we’ll invest elsewhere.” The implicit threat works. Countries compete to offer the most attractive deals, racing to the bottom while oil majors capture the lion’s share of value. ...

Swedish Gripen fighter jet with civilian technology spillovers flowing from it

How a Fighter Jet Paid for Itself: The Hidden Economics of Military Spending

Key Takeaways 2.6× Return: The Swedish Gripen program generated civilian spillovers worth 2.6× its development cost – Sweden got the jet "for free" plus additional growth. The Customer as Co-Inventor: Military procurement agencies don't just buy – they actively drive innovation by setting demanding requirements. Off-the-Shelf = Missed Opportunity: Buying foreign equipment looks cheaper but sacrifices the domestic innovation benefits entirely. From Missiles to Maps: Apple's 3D mapping came from missile targeting systems; your dental implants came from cannon manufacturing expertise. Invention ≠ Business: Creating technology is only half the battle – commercialization infrastructure determines whether spillovers become growth. When a new military jet screams across the sky, it’s easy to see it as a symbol of immense public cost – a black hole for taxpayer money. The price tags on advanced defense systems dominate headlines and fuel debates about national priorities. ...