Fire

When Disaster Strikes 1 Part 1: Disasters Don't Create Inequality-They Reveal It 2 Part 2: Why Some Cities Burn (And Others Don't) 3 Part 3: The Sacrifice Calculus 4 Part 4: Elite Disaster Strategies 5 Part 5: Famine and Political Power 6 Part 6: Earthquakes and Governance 7 Part 7: Pandemic Politics 8 Part 8: Why We Forget ← Series Home Key Takeaways Cities choose to burn: Fire-resistant construction exists in every era. Whether it's mandated is a political choice. Codes follow catastrophe: Building codes are typically written after major fires, not before—and they're only enforced where political power demands it. The pattern of destruction: Poor neighborhoods burn more frequently because fire prevention requires investment that requires political voice. Reconstruction as opportunity: After great fires, some cities transform; most rebuild the same vulnerabilities that made them burn. The Fire That Rebuilt London On September 2, 1666, a fire started in Thomas Farriner’s bakery on Pudding Lane. By the time it burned out four days later, the Great Fire of London had destroyed 13,200 houses, 87 churches, and most of the buildings of the City of London. Miraculously, only six deaths were officially recorded—though the actual toll was certainly higher. ...

The Secret Life of Ordinary Objects ← Series Home Cities, those immense, crowded artifacts of human civilization, are often hailed as triumphs of permanence and order. Yet, viewed across the sweep of history, they are profoundly fragile constructs, perpetually vulnerable to the chaos of nature and, more often, to the failures of human governance. The most immediate and brutal threat to any urban center, short of warfare, is fire. A city that burns repeatedly does so not primarily for technical reasons, but for political and economic ones. Fire policy, in its enforcement and its neglect, serves as a ruthless barometer, revealing precisely which lives, which properties, and which segments of the population matter—and which can be sacrificed to the flames. ...