The Endowment Effect of Digital Ownership: 5 Surprising Truths About Why We Overvalue What We Own

Introduction: The Invisible Force Behind Your Possessions

Have you ever tried to sell a used car, a piece of furniture, or even an old smartphone, only to feel that every offer you receive is offensively low? Or maybe you’ve felt an irrational attachment to a digital item in a video game that has no real-world value. This feeling isn’t just about sentimentality; it’s the result of a powerful cognitive bias called the “endowment effect”—an invisible force that convinces us our stuff is special, just because it’s ours.

This cognitive bias is more complex and surprising than it seems. It shapes our decisions in ways we rarely notice, from our closets to our online accounts. This article explores five of the most impactful truths about the endowment effect that reveal how deeply ownership influences our perception of value.

1. It’s About “Psychological Ownership,” Not Just a Legal Title

You don’t need a receipt or a deed to feel like something is yours. The endowment effect is driven by a feeling of psychological ownership, which can arise even without any legal or physical claim to an object.

Research shows this feeling can be triggered in surprisingly simple ways. Merely touching an object can begin to generate a sense of ownership. Even imagining touching it is enough to start the process. The same is true when we invest ourselves in an object—think of the time spent meticulously arranging the apps on a new phone, choosing the custom features for a car online, or even the labor involved in assembling a piece of IKEA furniture. That effort creates a psychological link.

This is a powerful insight because it reveals how easily our brains form attachments. It’s a principle marketers and salespeople have long understood. When you take a car for a test drive or sign up for a free software trial, you’re not just evaluating a product—you’re building a sense of psychological ownership that makes it harder to part with later.

2. Digital “Stuff” Has a Powerful Hold on Us, Too

If you think this effect only applies to things you can hold in your hand, think again. The endowment effect extends robustly into the digital world, influencing how we value things we can’t even touch.

Consider these examples from recent studies:

• Virtual Fashion: When people use avatars in virtual environments, the feeling of embodiment transfers a sense of psychological ownership to digital items like virtual sneakers, making them value those items more.
• Software Development: Developers can develop feelings of ownership over software features they have merely specified, long before those features are even built.
• Online Auctions: The act of bidding in an internet auction can create a sense of “imagined possession,” leading bidders to overvalue the item and pay more than they otherwise would.

This is a crucial insight for our increasingly digital lives. It shows that we form real emotional and value-based connections to our intangible assets, whether they’re a domain name, a virtual collectible, or a personalized software setting.

3. It’s Less About Loss and More About You

The traditional explanation for the endowment effect is loss aversion—the idea that the pain of giving something up feels more intense than the pleasure of gaining something equivalent. But fear of loss is only half the story. The other, more powerful half is about you.

A deeper explanation lies in the value-enhancing effects of ownership. This is driven by our natural self-enhancement biases: we have a tendency to see ourselves in a positive light, and that glow extends to our belongings. When we own something, we unconsciously transfer our positive self-associations to it. The object becomes an extension of ourselves, and our rosy view of “me” gets projected onto “mine,” inflating its perceived value.

This means our possessions become intertwined with our identity. Letting go of an object isn’t just a simple transaction; it can feel personal because, on a subconscious level, it feels like giving up a small piece of who we are.

4. Your Culture Shapes Your Sense of Ownership

One of the most surprising findings is that this cognitive bias isn’t a universal constant. The strength of the endowment effect can change significantly depending on where you live and your cultural background.

Studies comparing different cultures have found a distinct pattern:

• Western participants typically show a robust and consistent endowment effect.
• East Asian participants, on the other hand, tend to show much weaker effects.

The reason for this difference appears to be linked to cultural views of the self. In more individualistic Western cultures, there is a greater emphasis on self-distinction. In more collectivist East Asian cultures, an “interdependent self-construal” is more common. Here, the sense of self is more fluid and extends to include close friends and family. This means the psychological boundary between what is “mine” and what is “ours” becomes blurred. In these cultures, a person might not feel a strong endowment effect for their own mug, but they might feel it powerfully for a family heirloom. This reveals that the extension of self can also apply to the valuation of their possessions, a fascinating insight into how a seemingly fundamental cognitive bias is actually shaped by our cultural programming.

5. This Personal Bias Creates Market-Wide Problems

This gap—the difference between what a seller is willing to accept (WTA) and what a buyer is willing to pay (WTP)—leads to a general reluctance to trade. Sellers consistently demand more than buyers are willing to offer, causing transactions that would otherwise be mutually beneficial to fail.

This phenomenon directly challenges traditional economic theories like the Coase Theorem, which assumes that the initial allocation of property rights shouldn’t matter for economic efficiency. The endowment effect proves that it matters a great deal. It’s a clear demonstration of how individual, and seemingly irrational, human behavior can have a large-scale impact on economic models and real-world markets.

Conclusion: What Are Your Possessions Saying About You?c theories like the Coase Theorem, which assumes that the initial allocation of property rights shouldn’t matter for economic efficiency. The endowment effect proves that it matters a great deal. It’s a clear demonstration of how individual, and seemingly irrational, human behavior can have a large-scale impact on economic models and real-world markets.

Conclusion: What Are Your Possessions Saying About You?

Our sense of ownership is a powerful and often irrational psychological force. It subtly alters the value of everything we possess, influencing our decisions in both the physical and digital worlds, from the car in the driveway to the avatar on the screen. It is shaped by our culture, tied to our identity, and powerful enough to disrupt economic markets.

Now that you know this, take a look at the things you own. Which ones are you valuing for what they do, and which are you valuing for what they say about you?

References

Ashworth, L., Darke, P., McShane, L., & Vu, T. (2019). The rules of exchange: The role of an exchange surplus in producing the endowment effect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.03.012

Brasel, S., & Gips, J. (2014). Tablets, touchscreens, and touchpads: How varying touch interfaces trigger psychological ownership and endowment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.10.003

Dugstad, A., Brouwer, R., Grimsrud, K., Kipperberg, G., Lindhjem, H., & Navrud, S. (2024). Nature is ours! – Psychological ownership and preferences for wind energy. Energy Economics, 129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107239

Ehrlinger, J. (2016). Decision-Making and Cognitive Biases. Encyclopedia of Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397045-9.00206-8

Feng, T., Zhao, W., & Donnay, G. (2013). The endowment effect can extend from self to mother: Evidence from an fMRI study. Behavioural Brain Research, 248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.04.005

Fink, L., & Geldman, D. (2017). The effects of consumer participation in product construction and design on willingness to pay: The case of software. Computers in Human Behavior, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.039

Gal, D. (2021). Why the sun will not set on the endowment effect: the endowment effect after loss aversion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.021

Kim, D., & Jang, J. (2025). Me, my avatar, and my sneakers: The effect of avatar customization on the psychological ownership of virtual fashion items. Computers in Human Behavior, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.108653

LeBarr, A., & Shedden, J. (2017). Psychological ownership: The implicit association between self and already-owned versus newly-owned objects. Consciousness and Cognition, 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.11.012

Leitzel, J. (2022). Athens or London? The Parthenon Marbles and economic efficiency. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100325

Liu, R., Jiang, J., Yu, C., Rodenbiker, J., & Jiang, Y. (2021). The endowment effect accompanying villagers’ withdrawal from rural homesteads: Field evidence from Chengdu, China. Land Use Policy, 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105107

Morewedge, C., & Giblin, C. (2015). Explanations of the endowment effect: an integrative review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.004

Park, S., Gim, J., Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2025). From guests to Owners: The power of reactive personalization in shaping perceived ownership in hotels. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2025.101300

Peck, J., Barger, V., & Webb, A. (2013). In search of a surrogate for touch: The effect of haptic imagery on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.09.001

Shmueli, O., Pliskin, N., & Fink, L. (2015). Explaining over-requirement in software development projects: An experimental investigation of behavioral effects. International Journal of Project Management, 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.07.003

Sparks, S., Cunningham, S., & Kritikos, A. (2016). Culture modulates implicit ownership-induced self-bias in memory. Cognition, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.003

Wang, (Xiao-Tian) X., Ong, L., & Tan, J. (2015). Sense and sensibility of ownership: Type of ownership experience and valuation of goods. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2015.04.010

Zhao, W., Geng, Y., Luo, L., Zhao, Z., Ma, X., Xu, L., Yao, S., & Kendrick, K. (2017). Oxytocin Increases the Perceived Value of Both Self- and Other-Owned Items and Alters Medial Prefrontal Cortex Activity in an Endowment Task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00272