Global clean technology investment (2022)
Year-over-year growth in clean tech investment
CO₂ emissions increase above 2019 peaks
Energy density achieved in asymmetric supercapacitors
The Perpetual Power Loop - Part 2: Lithium’s Second Life: Powering Tomorrow with Closed-Loop Storage Materials
The world urgently requires energy transition to mitigate severe climate change. Clean energy systems demand reliable methods for energy storage, making battery technology indispensable. Lithium-Ion Batteries (LIBs) represent the state-of-the-art power sources for mobile electronics and electric vehicles. These devices are also promising candidates for future stationary energy storage applications due to their high energy density. However, the advancement of these energy systems depends significantly on securing key material supplies, particularly lithium.
The traditional linear economy model, characterized by resource extraction and disposal, threatens the long-term sustainability of this energy transition. Therefore, the global energy sector must curtail linear processes and replace them with circular alternatives. A robust Circular Economy (CE) approach for energy materials involves optimizing resource utilization, particularly through efficient recovery and reuse of critical battery components.
Lithium: The New Gold for Energy Storage
Lithium, the lightest metal, is critically important for modern energy storage due to its high electrochemical potential. As the backbone of LIB technology, lithium’s availability is paramount for meeting future global energy demands. Global clean technology investment reached approximately $1.1 trillion in 2022, marking an increase of more than 31% over the previous year. This escalating investment drives immense demand for materials used in these clean technologies, including lithium.
Policymakers advocate strongly for a shift to low-carbon energy systems globally. This transition necessitates development of a resourceful economy based on CE principles and closed-loop approaches. Recycling and reutilization of battery components demand significant technical and regulatory improvements to ensure sustainable material flow. Experts estimate that global carbon dioxide emissions surpassed 2019 peaks by 1%, underscoring the massive scale of the challenge in transitioning away from polluting causes.
The Ubiquity and Mobility of Lithium
Lithium occurs naturally in diverse environments, sometimes presenting environmental challenges. It is officially classified as an emerging environmental contaminant, showing mobility within the soil-plant system. Lithium concentrations vary widely across different media. For example, river sediments in the Dongqu River, Tibetan Plateau, China, show concentrations ranging from 14.7 to 44.9 ppm. Conversely, the Stillwater wildlife management area in Nevada, USA, recorded wetland lithium concentrations greater than 1000 $\mu$g/L.
In soils, the concentration is also highly variable. Soil in the Jiajika rare metal mining area of China registered a high mean concentration of 169.5 ppm. However, the mean total lithium concentration in Gray forest soil in Russia’s Transbaikal region is much lower at 25.1 ppm. Water sources worldwide contain measurable lithium levels. Groundwater supplies across the United States contain lithium ranging from less than 1 $\mu$g/L to as high as 1700 $\mu$g/L.
Lithium salts historically have been used in medicine, particularly in treating bipolar disorder. Trace levels of lithium can also offer considerable beneficial effects on an individual’s mental well-being. However, high doses induce toxicity. Lithium toxicity affects various organisms, including cattle and three species of freshwater organisms commonly found in salmonid habitats. In rats, lithium has induced renal toxicity. The complex environmental profile and limited primary availability of lithium make its recycling a paramount goal for resource security.
Designing Sustainable Electrode Materials
Implementing the Circular Economy (CE) requires a materials-level focus, particularly in creating high-performance, recyclable battery components. Electrode materials form the essential core components of both batteries and supercapacitors. Research efforts emphasize sustainable and advanced materials for these applications, categorized by their dimensional network.
Carbon-based materials represent a promising and environmentally friendly choice for achieving benign mobility due to their low cost and abundance. These materials are primarily derived from biomass through controlled thermal processes.
Carbon-Based Electrodes
Biomass-derived carbon materials utilize methods like hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and pyrolysis.
- Hydrothermal Carbonization (HTC): This process obtains carbon material in a sealed hydrothermal vessel containing biomass and aqueous media. Temperatures range between 120–250°C for this conversion.
- Pyrolysis: This high-temperature carbonization takes place in an inert environment, typically between 500°C and 1000°C. Pyrolysis generally yields carbon materials characterized by a high specific surface area, crucial for efficient charge storage.
Advanced carbon nanostructures are increasingly investigated for supercapacitor applications. Carbon Quantum Dots (CQDs), classified as 0D carbon-based materials, are generating significant attention. Graphene (GR) and Graphene Oxide (GO) are 2D materials providing excellent electrical and electronic transportation properties necessary for electrochemical sensors and energy storage. For instance, a hybrid graphene oxide supercapacitor (GOSC) can function as both a battery (below 1.2 V) and a supercapacitor (above 1.5 V) depending on the voltage window.
Transition Metal Electrodes
Transition Metal Oxides (TMOs) and Transition Metal Hydroxides (TM(OH)s) also function as essential components, primarily as redox-active substances in high-performance supercapacitors. These metal-derived electrode materials rely on synthetic strategies for their construction. Transition metal oxide/hydroxide-based electrode materials are crucial for electrochemical energy storage.
Asymmetric supercapacitors, which require efficient electrode materials, often utilize advanced TMOs like nickel cobaltite ($\text{NiCo}_2\text{O}_4$) grown on biomass carbon. These asymmetric devices have achieved excellent energy densities, such as 68.8 Wh/kg in a reported configuration. The transition metal electrodes, derived from materials like $\text{Fe}_2\text{O}_3$ (Iron Oxide) and $\text{MnO}_2$ (Manganese Dioxide), offer unique nanostructures templated through self-sacrificing methods, improving lithium storage capabilities.
Maximizing Value: Recycling and Second-Life Use
The Circular Economy (CE) strategy prioritizes keeping resources in use for as long as possible through reuse, remanufacturing, and recycling. For LIBs, this involves utilizing the concept of multiple life-cycles for components.
Remanufacture and Reuse
The concept of Remanufacture represents a complete renewal of the product’s constitution, sometimes referred to as “second-life production”. This process requires extensive industrial activity. Remanufacturing involves systematically disassembling the product, carefully inspecting, cleaning, and repairing or replacing damaged parts. The objective is to produce an item that functions equivalently to a newly manufactured product.
Furthermore, batteries that lose capacity for primary vehicle use can be channeled into second-life applications. Reuse of these retired batteries as stationary energy storage devices, such as in community microgrids, significantly promotes the transition to a cleaner energy system. This practice maximizes the utility of the expensive battery pack before material recycling is necessary.
Material Recovery and Recycling
When remanufacture or reuse is no longer feasible, the focus shifts to material recovery. Recycling encompasses various processes designed to transform waste materials into new substances. This activity is classified as a long loop in the CE framework and is considered the least desirable intervention compared to upstream measures like refusal or repair. However, resource recovery through recycling is often more economically favorable than obtaining virgin materials through traditional mining.
Specific processes exist for the removal and recovery of lithium from waste materials, including spent LIBs. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are even being synthesized using recycled waste products, demonstrating the closed-loop potential for advanced energy materials. For example, $\text{Fe-BDC(W)}$ has been synthesized using recycled rust (for the Fe salt) and repurposed Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) plastic bottles (for the Benzene Dicarboxylic Acid (BDC) linker). The resulting MOF can then be utilized as an active component in a supercapacitor.
Challenges and the Path Forward
Despite clear environmental and economic drivers, the wholesale transition to a circular energy materials sector faces significant barriers. The global industrial sector continues to operate predominantly on linear models optimized for material throughput.
Financial barriers present a continuous obstacle. High upfront costs for new circular infrastructure and long payback periods often discourage companies from investing in recycling and remanufacturing capacity. Furthermore, regulatory challenges impede smooth transition. Policy barriers include a lack of clear definitions, gaps in legislation, and differing national implementations, especially across borders. These issues make cross-border circulation of recovered materials complex and expensive. Overcoming these legislative hurdles requires strong government enforcement and cooperation, along with harmonized international standards.
The energy sector must curtail these linear processes by promoting innovation and R&D. Research supports the development of new battery designs that utilize renewable materials. Policy interventions, such as those promoting Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and providing incentives for eco-design, are vital tools for driving change at the corporate level. By supporting organizational changes, such as adopting systems thinking and integrating reverse logistics, companies can move toward circular supply chains. This concerted global effort ensures that crucial resources, particularly lithium, remain a perpetual asset rather than a finite constraint on our clean energy future.
