Key Takeaways

  1. Envy vs. Jealousy: Envy responds to perceived lack of valuable object, jealousy to perceived loss of possession.
  2. Benign Envy's Value: Triggers constructive "leveling up" motivation toward self-improvement and emulation.
  3. Malicious Envy's Risk: Drives destructive "leveling down" hostility to diminish envied person's standing.
  4. Deservingness Factor: Malicious envy manifests when success appears undeserved, triggered by low perceived economic mobility.
  5. Policy Impact: Dispositional envy predicts preferences for inefficient, punitive policies prioritizing punishment over help.

The Dual Nature of Envy in Organizations

Managers need psychological precision to channel organizational comparison effectively. The potent human emotion of envy drives competitive behavior, but its effects range from fueling excellence to destructive spite. First, managers must precisely distinguish envy from jealousy. Envy represents distress arising from a perceived lack of a valuable object or achievement that another person possesses. In contrast, jealousy involves distress related to a perceived loss of a relationship or possession one already holds to a rival. The critical differentiation is simple: “Have-nots are envious of those who have; those who have are jealous of what they have”.

This distinction sets the stage for analyzing envy’s crucial internal split: benign versus malicious. Benign envy prompts an upward motivation, inspiring the subject toward emulation and self-improvement to achieve the coveted good. Conversely, malicious envy spurs hostile intentions toward the superior person, focusing entirely on reducing the rival’s status or success. While all envy involves painful social comparison, only the benign form generates potentially welfare-increasing, socially productive effort. Malicious envy, however, aims to destroy or diminish the rival’s advantage. Understanding this dichotomy determines whether comparison becomes a constructive organizational force or a corrosive internal threat.

Comparison Distinction

The Economic Cost of Malicious Envy

Malicious envy imposes measurable economic deadweight loss on organizations and society. Malice rarely stays an empty emotion; it quickly metamorphoses into harmful actions like retaliation and sabotage. When high achievers lag behind, envious followers may engage in destructive behaviors that expend resources on unproductive, anti-social attempts to harm the envied. Historically, malicious behavior included ostracism, litigation, gossip, slander, and even homicide. In contemporary organizational settings, malicious envy translates directly into documented negative consequences such as negative word-of-mouth and boycott intentions toward successful entities, especially brands.

This destructive impulse culminates in the political sphere as the Wealthy-Harming Preference (WHP). WHP represents a spite-based anti-welfare motivation: the desire to punish the successful even if that action proves economically inefficient. Empirical studies across three nations—including the United States, India, and the United Kingdom—tested this phenomenon. When participants faced a trade-off, 14% to 18% of people chose policy options maximizing taxation on the wealthy, even though this delivered substantially less financial aid to the poor. Statistical analysis confirmed dispositional envy was the only reliable predictor for this outcome. A unit increase in measured envy correlated with a 23% to 47% greater odds of selecting the punitive, inefficient policy. Malice thus actively undermines social welfare by prioritizing leveling down the wealthy over leveling up the poor.

Envy Human Impact

What's Next?

**The dual calculus of envy** reveals how psychological precision can transform destructive comparison into productive motivation. But what happens when envy scales from individual psychology to macroeconomic forces? In our next post, we'll examine **The Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis**, where we'll discover how relative status concerns create measurable economic inefficiency in labor markets.

Continue to: The Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis →

Photo Grid Envy Consequences

References

  • Bak, H., & Yi, Y. (2024). Brand envy in economic disparity: Understanding and mitigating malicious envy towards brands among consumers perceiving limited economic mobility. Journal of Business Research, 184, 114896.
  • Protasi, S. (2017). ‘I’m not envious, I’m just jealous!’: On the Difference Between Envy and Jealousy. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 3(3), 316-333.
  • Protasi, S. (2021). In the Beginning Was Phthonos: A Short History of Envy (Appendix).
  • Protasi, S. (2016). Varieties of Envy. Philosophical Psychology, 29(4), 535-549.
  • Sabah, A., Aljaberi, M. A., et al. (2024). Psychometric properties of the Benign and Malicious Envy Scale: A cross-cultural study in the Arab Maghreb countries. Acta Psychologica, 248, 104397.
  • Schoeck, H. (1969). Envy: A Theory of Social Behavior.
  • Smith, R. H., & Kim, S. H. (2007). Comprehending envy. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 46–64.
  • Smith, R. H. (2015). The Important Distinction Between Benign and Malicious Envy. Psychology Today.
  • Smith, R. H., Parrott, W. G., Ozer, D., & Moniz, A. (1994). Subjective injustice and inferiority as predictors of hostile and depressive feelings in envy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(6), 705–711.
  • Sznycer, D., et al. (2017). Support for redistribution is shaped by compassion, envy, and self-interest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(31), 8129–8134.
  • van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2009). Leveling up and down: The experiences of benign and malicious envy. Emotion, 9(3), 419–429.
  • Grossman, P. J., & Komai, M. (2013). Within and Across Class Envy: Anti-Social Behaviour in Hierarchical Groups. Discussion Paper 02/13.