Defense and Future – Part 3: The Coming Age of Synthetic Persuasion

The Paradoxical Pursuit of Immortality and Certainty

At the beginning of the third millennium, humanity has prioritized conquering famine, plague, and war, and is now setting its sights on audacious new goals: achieving immortality, bliss, and divinity,. This pursuit is fundamentally enabled by breakthroughs in biotechnology and information technology. However, this unprecedented access to scientific power comes with a severe existential risk: the technology capable of upgrading Homo sapiens into Homo deus may also be powerful enough to render the unenhanced human irrelevant,. This dilemma is driven by a deep ideological conflict stemming from the rise of algorithms and the challenge they pose to the liberal humanist ideals of free will and individual sovereignty.

The Algorithmic Overthrow: A Coup De Gens

This is not a violent coup d’état by the state, but a silent “coup de gens”—an overthrow of the people’s sovereignty concealed as technological progress. It is driven by the prediction imperative, which demands total certainty in predicting behavior, bypassing human decision rights in favor of guaranteed market outcomes,,.

The Annihilation of Autonomy

Organisms as Self-Deceiving Algorithms

The foundation of instrumentarian power lies in the belief that human free will is an illusion. Neuroscientific evidence suggests that many decisions are the result of deterministic or random biochemical processes, and that our consciousness merely narrates the actions already decided by these competing internal algorithms,,. The mind is revealed as a conflict between the impulsive “experiencing self” and the storytelling “narrating self,” which fabricates coherent fictions to justify past behavior (often prioritizing the ‘peak-end rule’ over actual duration),,.

The consequence is that humans are inherently unreliable narrators of their own desires. This psychological frailty becomes the rationale for external control: since we cannot trust our own faulty minds, it is argued that we should transfer authority to algorithms that are better informed,. As the founder of the Quantified Self movement suggests, to “know thyself,” one should not rely on philosophy but rather on algorithms that analyze biometric data to reveal true patterns.

The Usurpation of the Future Tense

This manipulation is implemented through Big Other—the global, sensate, computational apparatus comprising smart devices, sensors, and networks. Examples include:

• Behavioral Modification: Using predictive analytics to determine the moment a young person is most vulnerable to specific advertising cues (e.g., stressed or depressed) and intervening with a tailored message to stabilize “loyalty” or prompt a purchase,.
• The Uncontract: Automated systems, such as vehicular monitoring, can observe breaches of contract and execute procedures (like disabling a car engine) unilaterally, replacing the human social work of promise and trust with algorithmic compulsion,,,.

This systematic elimination of individual awareness and choice effectively usurps the elemental right to the future tense—the inherent capacity to imagine, intend, and commit to a future freely, defining one’s own destiny,. Synthetic persuasion seeks to replace the intentional human act of “I will” with the heteronomous, predetermined path of “You will”.

The Obsolescence of the Citizen

The convergence of AI and behavioral surveillance leads to radical consequences for society’s political and economic structures. Algorithms are poised to displace a wide array of human jobs, including those in law, medicine, and education,,. In the market, wealth is concentrated in the hands of the elite who own the sophisticated algorithms, leading to profound inequality.

More critically, democratic structures, which rely on the belief that the voter knows best, become obsolete. External algorithms, having access to every email, search, purchase, and biometric fluctuation, will be better equipped to predict and express a voter’s preferences than the voter’s own rationalizing, peak-end-rule-following mind,. In this post-liberal world, authority shifts from the individual self to the networked algorithms. The result is the privatization of the “division of learning in society,” where surveillance capital controls who knows and who decides,.

The Fight for the Soul of the Machine

Instrumentarianism is a market project of total certainty that seeks to achieve societal harmony and efficiency by eliminating human unpredictability,. If the “death of individuality” is not to be our destiny, society must engage in synthetic declarations—collective actions that challenge the foundational legitimacy of surveillance capitalism’s unilateral claims. The challenge is not technical, but existential: defending the sanctity of the individual and the will to will against a power that operates in stealth, cloaking its coercive intent in the language of convenience and inevitable progress. The power of AI is immense, but the core issue remains the human choice: whether we accept a future where we are merely objects to be optimized, or whether we assert our right to be the authors of our own imperfect, messy, and free destiny.