Key Insights


References

Aguilar-Hernandez, G. A., Dias Rodrigues, J. F., & Tukker, A. (2021). Macroeconomic, social and environmental impacts of a circular economy up to 2050: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123421.

Corvellec, H., Stowell, A. F., & Johansson, N. (2021). Critiques of the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26(3), 421–432.

European Commission. (2018). Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a monitoring framework for the circular economy. .

European Commission. (2025). Circular economy could slash up to 231 million tonnes of $\text{CO}_2$ from heavy industry per year.

European Parliament. (2023). Circular economy: definition, importance and benefits.

EY. (2023). How companies can leverage the circular economy to address global e-waste.

Greater London Authority. (n.d.). Design for a Circular Economy Primer.

H&M Group. (n.d.). Circular business models.

Johansson, N., Velis, C., & Corvellec, H. (2020). Towards clean material cycles: Is there a policy conflict between circular economy and non-toxic environment? Waste Management & Research, 38(7), 705–707.

Kezzler. (2024). R-strategies in the circular economy: Navigating the R-hierarchy. .

Lin, W.-C. (2022). Socioeconomic Implication of the Circular Economy: A Preliminary Study of The Impact on Employment and Local Economy in the United States. DSpace@MIT.

NREL. (2023). Environmental and Social Justice Considerations in a Circular Economy.

SafetyCulture. (2024). Circular Construction for Eco-Building.

Siderius, T., & Poldner, K. (2021). Reconsidering the circular economy rebound effect: Propositions from a case study of the Dutch circular textile valley. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 125996.

UNDP. (2023). What is circular economy and why does it matter?

Wiedenhofer, D., et al. (2025). The Circular Economy and Climate Change: The State of National and Global Evidence on Mitigation Potential. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 50, 563–592.