Compares the total US nuclear waste inventory against 130 million tonnes per year of coal combustion ash in hundreds of unlined surface ponds — a comparison of physical scale and toxicity that is arithmetically accurate and almost never presented.
Applies Lifetime Risk-Adjusted Carbon Score analysis to small modular reactors and advanced designs, showing how the risk and cost profile of next-generation nuclear differs from the 1950s cold-war fleet that dominates most public mental models.
Places Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima mortality against equivalent coal-generation death rates on a per-TWh basis, producing the comparison that reveals the conventional hierarchy of fear is inverted from the hierarchy of harm.
Introduces the Lifetime Risk-Adjusted Carbon Score and applies the Hansen-Kharecha finding that nuclear power prevented 1.84 million deaths through displacement of coal generation — a calculation receiving a fraction of the media attention given to any nuclear accident.