A three-part forensic series exposing how lifecycle assessment is not neutral science but a contested political arena, where methodological choices determine winners, hide impacts, and shape trillion-dollar transitions.
Conducts a post-mortem on the diesel scandal, showing how optimizing for one accounted metric (CO₂) while ignoring unaccounted others (NOₓ) engineered a public health catastrophe.
Deconstructs the controversial economic models behind the Social Cost of Carbon, examining how a single, abstract number justifies inaction or triggers radical policy.
Reveals how the deliberate selection of system boundaries in environmental accounting allows corporations and nations to offshore emissions and claim false progress.