↓ Skip to main content
Heltaher
Heltaher

The Invidious Engine: How Corporate Emulation Fosters Perpetual Demand

Key Insights
#

  • Companies systematically exploit envy to create perpetual demand cycles that prioritize social status over material utility.
  • Biological imperatives for rank drive consumers onto a “positional treadmill” where relative gains are nullified by group efforts.
  • Honorific waste and spiteful consumption sabotage economic efficiency, diverting resources from productive uses to status signaling.

References
#

  1. Akerlof, G. A., & Yellen, J. L. (1990). The Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis and Unemployment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(2), 255–283.
  2. Bak, H., & Yi, Y. (2024). Brand envy in economic disparity: Understanding and mitigating malicious envy towards brands among consumers perceiving limited economic mobility. Journal of Business Research, 184, 114896.
  3. Bosman, R., Sutter, M., & van Winden, F. (2005). The impact of real effort and emotions in the power-to-take game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 407–429.
  4. Duesenberry, J. S. (1949). Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior. Harvard University Press.
  5. Frank, R. H. (1985). Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status. Oxford University Press.
  6. Luttmer, E. F. P. (2005). Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 963–1002.
  7. Mui, V. L. (1995). The economics of envy. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 26(3), 311–336.
  8. Protasi, S. (2017). ‘I’m not envious, I’m just jealous!’: On the Difference Between Envy and Jealousy. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 3(3), 316–333.
  9. Sznycer, D., et al. (2017). Support for redistribution is shaped by compassion, envy, and self-interest, but not a taste for fairness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(31), 8420–8425.
  10. Veblen, T. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. Macmillan.