

The Predator's Calculus: Power, Deception, and the Choice to Resist
This series examines the fundamental mechanisms through which powerful entities—corporations, states, and institutions—maximize their interests. Drawing on historical examples and systemic analysis, it reveals how coercion, exchange, and deception operate as tools of power, how institutions often serve to legitimize predation rather than constrain it, and what effective resistance requires in the face of such dynamics.
Key Insights#
- Three Mechanisms of Power: Entities optimize through asymmetric force (coercion), symmetric exchange, or information asymmetry (deception), with deception being the most efficient.
- Hollow Institutions: International law, corporate governance, and regulatory frameworks emerge from power relations and serve the interests of those who design them.
- Strategic Resistance: Challenging systemic power requires building collective leverage, disrupting dependencies, and weaponizing transparency, even when victory is uncertain.
References#
Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 491-503.
Chomsky, N., & Herman, E. S. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books.
Dowie, M. (1977). Pinto madness. Mother Jones, September/October 1977, 18-32.
Eichenwald, K. (2005). Conspiracy of fools: A true story. Broadway Books.
Hochschild, A. (1998). King Leopold’s ghost: A story of greed, terror, and heroism in Colonial Africa. Houghton Mifflin.
Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. Metropolitan Books.
McAdam, D. (1999). Political process and the development of Black insurgency, 1930-1970 (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
Pachirat, T. (2011). Every twelve seconds: Industrialized slaughter and the politics of sight. Yale University Press.
Pateman, C. (2007). The settler contract. In C. Pateman & C. Mills (Eds.), Contract and domination (pp. 35-78). Polity Press.
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
Shaw, M. N. (2017). International law (8th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, C. (1985). War making and state making as organized crime. In P. B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, & T. Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the state back in (pp. 169-191). Cambridge University Press.
U.S. Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. (1976). Intelligence activities and the rights of Americans (Book II, Final Report). U.S. Government Printing Office.
Zinn, H. (2003). A people’s history of the United States: 1492-present (3rd ed.). HarperCollins.



